In Flight Projects Progress
EDIE Bugs + Improvements
Key | Summary |
|---|---|
Adding lowercase “the” to publication names when used with proper nouns (e.g., the Lancet) to ensure style consistency across EDIE suggestions. | |
Abbreviation expansions should be flagged as Issues for clarity; this helps authors triage impactful problems separately from Tips. | |
Book and journal titles should be styled in italics in EDIE output to match YSM and common editorial standards. | |
Relax restriction around the word “siloed” so valid usages are not incorrectly flagged as violations of YSM Voice. | |
Address a logic error that changes the meaning of sentences (e.g., “many” to “very different”) when offering readability improvements. | |
Prevent false positives for neutral words like “grim”; only flag when context truly conflicts with YSM guidance. | |
Detect abbreviated “Assoc.” that should be expanded to “associate” in formal contexts. | |
Prefer “PhD” suffix in biographical statements instead of “Dr.” prefix to match YSM style. | |
Use “%” in contexts where numerals are present and space is constrained; otherwise prefer the word “percent.” | |
Align with YSM style by using Roman numerals for “Phase II” rather than Arabic (“Phase 2”) in clinical contexts. | |
EDIE should only surface the most critical issues when multiple problems exist, to reduce noise for authors. | |
Resolve an intermittent timeout isolated to EDIE components; monitored via logs and alerts. | |
Correct heading-fix logic in EDIE v4 so level changes preserve meaning and hierarchy. | |
Ensure EDIE suggestions quote original article text accurately without introducing errors. | |
Ensure EDIE suggestions quote original article text accurately without introducing errors. | |
Public description: Update suggestion logic based on user testing to improve precision and reduce false positives. |
Publication Summaries: Access for Researchers to Review Their Own Summaries
Key | Summary |
|---|---|
Added a message to publications summaries acknowledging that they were created using AI and reviewed by humans. | |
Enabled researchers to review and edit the publication summaries for publications they are an author of. | |
Added logic to prompt a Dimensions profile review if a user tries to manually add a publication already imported into Beatrix from Dimensions. | |
Reviewed and clarified publication handling logic across custom and imported workflows to ensure consistent behavior, data integrity, and editability across PubMed, DOI, and custom publication types. | |
Updated the content fields of Publication Summaries so they are static, using the preferred summary format, instead of being customizable. | |
Added a Published By column to publication summary management so users can see who published each summary and when. | |
Locked publication summary fields until an AI draft is generated so all summaries begin with AI-created content before manual editing. | |
Automated publication summary generation for papers with a YSM first or last author and sent review notifications to the appropriate author so summaries can be verified before publication. | |
Added a “Reviewed AI Content and Approved” checkbox so users can confirm AI-generated content has been reviewed and approved. | |
Set up a weekly notification to inform members of the editorial team when a publication summary has been published by a researcher. |